I had to go read up a bit again. The below message, to me is a similar message to what the cat gave me yesterday. For emergence, it seems I had my understanding of a reasoning universe and space-time the wrong way round. Yes, I am quite aware. The very statement is a paradox.
The argument below makes sense to me. Now, I'm going to seek some correlation on a quantum model, which includes The Void. I'll get back to you on that one. "Only when these indeterminate causal relations between events are pruned away — so that nature realizes only some of the possibilities available to it — do space and time become meaningful. Quantum correlations come first, space-time later. Exactly how does space-time emerge out of the quantum world? Brukner said he is still unsure. As with the time capsule, the answer will come only when the time is right." https://www.quantamagazine.org/time-entanglement-raises-quantum-mysteries-20160119/ [https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2016/01/TimeEntangled_Ft.jpg]<https://www.quantamagazine.org/time-entanglement-raises-quantum-mysteries-20160119/> Time Entanglement Raises Quantum Mysteries | Quanta Magazine<https://www.quantamagazine.org/time-entanglement-raises-quantum-mysteries-20160119/> Bizarre quantum bonds connect distinct moments in time, suggesting that quantum links — not space-time — constitute the fundamental structure of the universe. www.quantamagazine.org ________________________________ From: John Rose <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 22 June 2018 1:46 PM To: 'AGI' Subject: RE: [agi] Blockchainifying Conscious Awareness Are you saying that you can’t have a purely temporal GHZ state blockchain without some spatial entanglement? But the photons used in the earlier blocks are gone, already absorbed. So you are left with entanglement in time. What happens then to the early blocks when tampering with the leading edge photons? Hard to wrap ones head around…. Does not make sense! John From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <[email protected]> Most interesting. So, the timespace continuum is effectively being split? I don't buy it. You cannot sustainably entangle one and not the other, not even as an antithesical exercise. You're just begging for your data to disappear into the Void. ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, 21 June 2018 11:11 PM Oohh now this is what I'm talkin 'bout, get a little AGI PSI action goin' on in that blockchain consciousness proposal: "Quantum Blockchain using entanglement in time" https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05979 John Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9353b0b8fd3894d8-M532d253e01a6511d302b8b55> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9353b0b8fd3894d8-Ma4898bb786e783f3a488478e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups
