We journey from the interesting to the banal. Apparently, for the relapse of 
mental rigor and structural integrity, we perpetually fail to cross the Abyss 
of understanding. All of this, mankind-in-extinct proximity, gives hope to AGI.

How hard could it ultimately be to simulate such a profane consciousness? That 
is why my hypothesis steers clear from using man as the baseline for the 
development of provable AGI functionality. Attaining a global, average IQ 
rating of 18 really is not much of a match for quantum, computing power.  Such 
is my version of consciousness.
________________________________
From: Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2018 6:39 PM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Honestly?

Your introspection is limited. Take more drugs.

Steve Richfield via AGI <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
schrieb am Mi., 19. Sep. 2018 23:41:

Jim,

There are several potential interpretations of this, with Rob's being but one 
(or just a few).

Continuing...
On 6:07PM, Tue, Sep 18, 2018 Jim Bromer via AGI 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I already regret asking these questions, but do you truly (really -
> honestly) believe that:
> Conscious Experience or soul or Qualia or the experience of being (or
> whatever you want to call it) does not actually exist (or occur)?

I have posted on the past that I STRONGLY suspect that what we perceive as 
consciousness isn't anything at all like what is really happening. 
Specifically, a massively parallel process comes to a decision, but all we 
perceive is the single tiny thread that succeeded in intersecting with one 
possible solution, while the remaining 99.9999% of the process, along with 
other potential solutions, remains completely invisible to us.

> and/or
> This experience (whatever you want to call it) can therefore occur in
> a computer program?

So, armed with this grossly oversimplified perception, people attempt to write 
programs to do the same things with 0.0001% of what is needed to do the job. 
Lotsa luck.

Are we on the same page here?

Steve Richfield
> Jim Bromer

Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / 
see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + 
participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery 
options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> 
Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2e5182d7ce6527f7-Mc70d34a5cf81e7a2d300bccc>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2e5182d7ce6527f7-Me5e673594caedd231b9c388c
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to