This is such a weird statement. Like you try to make the human look stupid, but it is really smarter for AI production to have smart humans. I kind of conclude you are not actually in the AI game yourself.
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 18:03, Matt Mahoney via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 9:44 AM Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> Matt Mahoney via AGI <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 7. Okt. 2018 >> 03:25: >> >>> I understand the desire to understand what an AGI knows. But that makes >>> you smarter than the AGI. I don't think you want that. >>> >> >> Sure I want that! >> > > No you don't. It would be like writing a chess program that you could > always beat. > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T55454c75265cabe2-Ma6f01d88c4758d17dc492263> > -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T55454c75265cabe2-Mb13783f913d6d9940f9511be Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
