Does a quale have to always pass the "qualitative character of sensation" test?
Any generalized system relying on the random, subjective input value of qualia would give rise to the systems constraint of ambiguity. Therefore, as a policy, all subjectively-derived data would introduce a semantic anomaly into any system - by design. This has significance for the assertion that qualia input would be useful for symbolic systems. With regards effective complexity, in the sense of generalized correctness as it pertains to generalized intelligence, an AGI design would have to empirically resolve the 'ambiguity' problem first. Else, it would result in (or take form as) a consciousness-challenged dumb device, like most computers still are today. ________________________________ From: WriterOfMinds <jennifer.hane....@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2019 14:44 To: AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> Subject: Re: [agi] Re: ConscioIntelligent Thinkings That is not what qualia are. Qualia are incommunicable and private. Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T41ac13a64c3d48db-M100a6fbb04132f410d7de3d6> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T41ac13a64c3d48db-Mfb4e7c925c5b4a5bbb64e05e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
