My code just does what yours does, lol. > 12 seconds to check the full 132MB for any of 72 words
Hmmm... I am actually not _that_ impressed. Searching 10 MB a second? In RAM? The search tree should fit in the cache, so that can't be the problem. On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 12:03, <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct. > I put the search items in a tree instead of putting the data in a tree. > The little tree searches the data. > What exactly does your code do? > > I made it faster: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/5lym9vl2fttrmgd/FasterFastSearch.rar?dl=0 > 268MB becomes 132MB and takes 12 seconds to check the full 132MB for any > of 72 words (could have set it to ex. 99999 words). It takes 12 seconds no > matter how many words are being searched for. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T44eb904095b7612b-Mc9a90dc86a6e89917679c73a> > -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T44eb904095b7612b-M9cd5f148b3c644a11e448af6 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
