The reviews of Randall Mills's book are not so charatable. https://sjbyrnes.com/cf/grand-unified-theory-of-classical-physics/
I could decide for myself but I'm not going to pay $1187. https://www.amazon.com/Grand-Unified-Theory-Classical-Physics/dp/0963517147 Mills is a medical doctor, not a physicist. I admit I have my own theories about physics but lack the background to prove them. For example, I think that an observer falling into a black hole and nearing the event horizon would see an expanding and accelerating universe. The event horizon would appear to wrap around due to gravitational lensing. We already know that objects near the horizon would appear to slow down and be red shifted. It would explain both dark energy and inflation without the need for any new physics. Dark energy is just gravity. The nonuniformity in the cosmic background radiation is due to the big bang starting from a small but not pointlike mass as it collapsed from an even larger universe. My motivation is that Einstein derived general relativity based on the local continuity of space-time, which would prohibit a sharp event horizon or a big bang singularity. The theory could be proven by finding the "hole" in the event horizon, possibly the CMB cold spot behind the Eridanus void, the biggest empty space in the universe. But I lack the math skills to solve this "inside out" black hole model of the universe from Einstein's equations for general relativity. On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 12:02 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ... >> If one takes Randell Mills's "Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics" >> seriously (and I do) he has, even *without* the above ansatz, has >> calculated an amazing array of physical properties >> <http://www.millsian.com/summarytables/SummaryTables022709S.pdf> from >> "fundamental constants only" and IIRC the number of such constants is >> smaller than in the Standard Model. I'll try to look up what that reduced >> set of constants is and provide it along with a formulary deriving other >> constants of the Standard Model. >> > > That set of constants is (according to Page 41, of GUToCP Volume 1 (2018 > edition) <https://brilliantlightpower.com/book/>, Foundations): > > - G > - The spin of the electron neutrino. > - The fundamental constants that comprise the fine structure constant: > - *µ0* > - *e *(charge of an electron) > - *c* > - *h* > > However, the competition is not string theory nor the Standard Model per > se, but QED+GR because GUToCP purports to cover those theories and > calculate their parameters from the above parameters to the formulas given > in the book, some of which are old standards, such as ε0 = 1/(*c*² > *µ0).* > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M89a4f1484f7a0e5423a7b19d> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M01649133c86d5d6e131a1035 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
