On 2019-11-08 00:57:AM, WriterOfMinds wrote:
Do you think the definition works any better if we modify or clarify it by defining all tools (including body parts) to be part of the environment?
We could say that "the environment" is presumed to include all non-psychological attributes - such as sensors, motors and tools. I.e. it is shorthand for "the environment of the brain". However, as it stands, Legg's proposed definition says it is talking about the intelligence of "an agent" - not just its brain. If we are getting into counter-intuitive definitions of "agent" and "environment" then I think they should be explicitly spelled out. -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ [email protected] 617-671-9930 ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6cada473e1abac06-M3d47d47b47793d7aa0ca8e36 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
