Yes to the theory "no search algorithm performs better than a random brute force search on *all possible datasets*." But like I explained: the system of Earth does have a determined/predictable end form it's reaching/evolving to by universal physics, and so that's all that matters: Darwinian Survival - which causes the final form/sort. So there actually 'is' a better search algorithm that performs better In The Physics we have. But there's nothing that is 'performs better', 'ugly', 'Good', 'gay', 'evil', all there is is what evolution; physics Does in the end and settles into. So yes there is a 'search algorithm' that 'performs' (happens) over other future scenarios. So view life as a deterministic, predictable, context weigh-in of patterns tallied up and that that search algorithm is what decides the future; the global context of particles in their current sort.
Don't separate language and computer vision. They are the same data/context and OpenAI etc show this too, all is 'language' / 'data' ; context. Based on the real world. And are descriptions of Earth used by humans. We think about them as speech or imagery ex. cat>walks>to>bowl>wait>eats>returns back>sits>sleeps. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-Mf190f2fdb97ac9063840fd16 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
