Back in the good old days of hacking the page rank algorithm, people had these content generation tools that would take an article and generate a gazillion synonymous articles by going through and substituting synonyms for various words in various combinations. As google got wise to this, these tools became more and more sophisticated and various arguments were put forward like, "We're helping Google's search engine produce quality search results by more intelligently covering relevant search terms for our content!"
The logical extent of this is to produce "synonymous" content that Google can't detect is an automatically generated article with essentially the same content. So, my dear Professor Rose, how are we to assure ourselves that this is _not_ GPT-3 output of a satirical article written by some human out there on the intarwebz that got gobbled up in its training corpus? On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:40 PM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey I got a name how about Textianity? First commandment: Thou shalt not > SPAM. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T72ec30e7be059220-M91790acf3228a183dfe827ec> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T72ec30e7be059220-Me90cff6a283660089416c0f6 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
