If only the IQ test hadn't been deep-sixed by Boaspawn. On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:39 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020, 9:24 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> HA! >> >> https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/10/training-exceeds-gpt3/ >> > > I find it interesting that we needed a new, harder NLP benchmark, > Superglue, because systems were already scoring above human level in GLUE. > The appendix of the Superglue paper has some example problems. They would > be hard for a lot of humans. > > So I guess AGI is solved. Or will we keep raising the bar? If a computer > can do it, then it's not intelligence. > >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6761a13445e5864b-Mc482a2014e4f769c53f505aa> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6761a13445e5864b-Me2f727373d3c64a1d4a03c79 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
