What do you mean by "Boaspawn infestation of Google"?
At 2020-10-10 05:34:03, "James Bowery" <[email protected]> wrote: I can't help but suspect that the _real_ reason we're 10 years into Legg's Measures of Machine Intelligence and still not using it, despite Legg co-founding Google DeepMind, is the Boaspawn infestation of Google, secondary to network effect rents attracting all manner of rentiers highly evolved to sniff out economic rent from 10,000 miles away -- sending them into a frenzy. On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:27 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: If only the IQ test hadn't been deep-sixed by Boaspawn. On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:39 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Oct 6, 2020, 9:24 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: HA! https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/10/training-exceeds-gpt3/ I find it interesting that we needed a new, harder NLP benchmark, Superglue, because systems were already scoring above human level in GLUE. The appendix of the Superglue paper has some example problems. They would be hard for a lot of humans. So I guess AGI is solved. Or will we keep raising the bar? If a computer can do it, then it's not intelligence. Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + delivery optionsPermalink ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6761a13445e5864b-M49dd2777d2ba7f7bcc0702c2 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
