Let me put it like this: If you have a Big Dataset consisting of multi-terabytes that starts out as:
3.141592654.... Do you go looking for "correlations" in the bit string? I'd call them morons except that they're heavily cited in the "algorithmic bias" literature which, nowadays, is all about _avoiding_ finding _certain_ things out from the data. On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:09 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > They don't understand the first thing about computer programming, let > alone algorithmic information theory. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy#Type-0_grammars > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 5:38 PM stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The paper really does sound convincing. Doesn't it depend on the >> threshold of how de define correlation? >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery >> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fb4ca2156188e9-M7de3d54126839f4e727c2f11> >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fb4ca2156188e9-Mb770aced737bb8b097f61832 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
