@Ben: I've been needing a thousand-foot overview of your work, and this paper sounds like the most recent version of that? I can't comment yet, but will look forward to reading it when I can find the time.
On Friday, April 02, 2021, at 10:47 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > Quantum computing may be useful for a lot of things, but AGI isn't one of > them. All the evidence says that neural networks are the way to solve vision, > language, and robotics. No. All the evidence says that so far, neural networks have gotten closest to solving vision, language, and robotics. Whether they will actually solve them or get stuck in a local optimum somewhere below human performance remains an open question. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. In any case, a quantum computer is a hardware platform, not an algorithm (though it may suit itself better to some types of algorithms than to others). So who says you couldn't find a way to optimize neural computing with it? ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9a211170d976967d-M7cd2e9933875a8a3736617a0 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
