On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, at 8:32 PM, immortal.discoveries wrote: > Yes stefan, if you saw 'cat ran' 3 times and 'cat slept' 1 time, your > predictions for 'cat' are cat>(ran=75% likely, slept=25% likely). My point was that I will definitely not scan the WHOLE vocabulary. So theĀ correct thing to say is probably that only some small neighborhood of the vocabulary is actually looked at. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf856e4082d9ea09a-M3ad9edd0f091345e77bf4557 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
- [agi] Re: BIT predictor immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: BIT predictor Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: BIT predictor immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: BIT predictor immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: BIT predi... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: BIT ... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: ... stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
- Re: [agi] Re: ... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: ... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: ... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: ... stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI
- Re: [agi] Re: ... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: ... immortal . discoveries
- Re: [agi] Re: ... Matt Mahoney
- Re: [agi] Re: ... immortal . discoveries
