On Friday, June 11, 2021, at 3:26 PM, stefan.reich.maker.of.eye wrote:
> I don't know if I said it before, but making the decompressor nothing but a
> bytecode interpreter is a really smart move. It's probably a mathematical
> fact that every compressor which advances sufficiently will eventually use
> this method. Right? You can't get better than Turing-complete.
You mean predicting the Next Byte (letter) of a sentence? Yes. Personally I
think having only 256 predictions max is efficient, bitwise is only 1/0 but
seems complex to implement and isn't the only champion methodology. AGI can
still predict the next BIT by predicting the word eventually like so: b i t :
1. And yes Byte Pair Encoding if you mean that is efficient way of knowing the
parts of data, helps storage and time, not wasted on storing predictions for
alking, but only walking and ing. And we byte pair encode "p she walked, Then
ppp we saw birds p anpd walkedp to the ?" the [ppp] because they are while not
common seen it is a 'similar class' of objects hence they go together and are a
"part" like ing and walk and walking in that sentence. You can do this even if
saw ppp only once.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta8a0e64036790330-M5ad275beaf53abe5203b8bb5
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
