By the way, a brief examination of the formulas and sensitivities should immediately point to Ashkenazi Jews as a strategic target of attack by the Chinese but there is a more subtle and profound reason to suspect this than the mere IQ advantage:
Ashkenazi Jews are a market dominant minority without essential dependence on any given nation state. See, for example, this article titled "Questions of Survival <http://web.archive.org/web/20060701180908/http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/730443.html>" and this quote: *The fear expressed that "a real decline of the West, particularly the United States, would have dramatic consequences for the Jewish people," also led to controversy. Brandeis University president Jehuda Reinharz agreed that this type of decline can be expected "in the coming two decades" - but Stuart Eisenstadt was less emphatic about it. He believes the United States will remain the leading power. In all events, it was agreed the Jews "should strengthen cultural links with non-Western civilizations, particularly China and also India," powers that are on the ascent. This is not a question of preference or closeness; it is a question of survival, of readiness for the future. How should this be done? That will have to be the topic of discussion in the next gatherings already being planned.* As a market dominant minority with a history of international migration due to "questions of survival" Jews in general, but Ashkenazi more so than others, have developed strong biases toward "open societies" (ala George Soros) but also toward centralizing power and wealth that is portable "to escape persecution". Indeed, JFK's book "A Nation of Immigrants" was ghost written by the ADL, and The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, with the following half-century of relentlessly increasing rates of mass immigration, was supported by every major Jewish organization while the US population opposed this policy by an overwhelming supermajority over that time. At the present this has ripped the social capital of the US to shreds -- and that's not even talking about the centralization of wealth and power in the public and private sectors, with the resulting leftist corporations censoring The Nation of Settlers with the full support of Conservatism, Inc. Combine this with Chinese experience with the Disraeli-era opium trade and it is highly likely the Chinese have a long cultural memory of the psychology of Jews, their weaknesses and strengths and it's pretty obvious where to look for the CCP's covert support of addictive political economy ideas among Jews. The "Questions of Survival" article, in 2006, likely exposed some attempts to establish the connections stated. A decade later, after finding doors to China not quite as open as they'd hoped, Trump said "Mexican rapists", I said he was "The Likud Candidate" and he began playing hardball with China. The US intelligence agencies are like drooling idiots in all this, due to fear of being called "antisemites". The Likuds aren't as stupid but they woke up too late and Trump lost. Now we have a totally LoboBidenized government. On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:25 PM James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:09 AM Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 10:25 AM James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Why America Lost The Cold War With The Chinese Communists >>> <https://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2020/12/why-america-lost-cold-war-with-chinese.html> >>> >> >> If I understand your code correctly, you claim that China has access to >> 32 times as many geniuses (IQ > 140) as the USA,... >> > > Not quite. The metric isn't just number of individuals above IQ 140. The > metric also adds value the higher the IQ above 140 for each such individual > genius: > > * The increasing *value* of increasing IQ beyond the genius threshold >> (140 IQ in the below model). > > > This is reflected in the "x*" factor of the definite integral: > > genius_continuous:integrate(x*population*gaussian, x, genius_IQ, inf); > > > That's probably an underestimate of the value since we're talking about > military (unrestricted warfare) dominance: Their highest IQ vs our highest > IQ. > > >> and this advantage would drop to 16 without affirmative action. Is this >> correct? >> > > Something like that. > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tace3f9aea35af378-M20b6dd071fcee3dabc172b7d Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
