By now, these so-called almost-AGI's should be able to at least answer/reason such questions about their own inner workings & compared to others? No? Fed these tons of AGI papers, specifications and theory, what do they respond? Towards bootstrapping themselves maybe, or is that impossible and to co-operate with each other, could they harness each other's strengths to become a stronger whole?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 16:22 Brett N Martensen <[email protected]> wrote: > It is always easier to ask questions than read a detailed description, try > to understand it and compare it with ones own work or others. The work is > being done by the person who has to answer the questions. In this case I > suggest the work be done by the questioner. I have already spent numerous > hours on Accord explaining my approach. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1675e049c274c867-M9b5e14d7af2ce7104b07deb5> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1675e049c274c867-Mcab2f4a44a2c5ef216b93a5e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
