A movie costs $1 million. AGI costs $1 quadrillion, but you can produce all the movies you want for free.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021, 5:10 PM Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: > Why spend time on an AGI movie? Wouldn't the time be better spent on > theory and implementation? Speaking of movies, take Casablanca. My > favorite lines: > > Girl: Will I see you tonight? > Bogart: I don't make plans that far ahead. > > It's like this with AGI. People talk about machines deciding this, > doing that, but where is it? Planning too far ahead... > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:39 AM Mohammadreza Alidoust > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What a movie! Greaaat! > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021, 14:30 Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> We should use AGI to create the movie. We could use GPT-3 to auto > complete the script, and DALL-E to generate the movie scenes. :) > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 5:41 PM Mohammadreza Alidoust < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thank you all. I really enjoyed your ideas and great scenarios. > However, my scenario is different. > >>> > >>> In my dream script, I have roles for the members of the AGI Society so > they act as themselves. (And I wish they accept acting in the film) . It > would be nice to have a film whose actors/actresses are all AGIS members. > And why not to have you talented people as superstars? > >>> > >>> Actually, all I want to do is to turn my idea to a script, screenplay, > or whatever you name it. Then professional filmmakers would do the rest. I > have to find a way, perhaps connections in Hollywood ;) > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 00:22 Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> There are differences in what we should be doing with AGI, what we > will actually do with it, and what we show a movie audience. > >>>> > >>>> We think we will be building humanoid robots that become conscious, > mostly because Hollywood says so. What we will actually be doing is > automating labor with language, vision, and robotics. We don't need to > reproduce human weaknesses like emotions to get what evolution programmed > us to want. We don't need human shaped robots except maybe for sex. > >>>> > >>>> AGI might result in a state of eternal bliss for all of humanity or > our uploads, or it might be self replicating nanotechnology that displaces > DNA based life. What we should be doing is deciding which future we want. > And I am not so sure. > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 1:09 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > "Besides, your utopia of magic genies sucks." > >>>>> > >>>>> Dude...unimpressed... > >>>>> > >>>>> The world will turn into a nanobot hive (very technological/ > advanced) that is the final most advanced technology that repairs instantly > and is immortal, it will always be in bliss. The only thing left will be it > will seek to grow in size by eating more matter and cloning by "sex" and > repair minute things damaged, IDK if it will be in pain, pain seems to > pressure all areas like repair and damage and trying to improve at X, but > for what it is worth, this is supposed to be an always happy system and yes > it can keep enjoying the same meal or video game by simply erasing memories > or feeling unbored of it. Such a system like this seeks to be immortal and > ends up lasting, it does not suicide nor will it. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is no nor needed a "build up romance", you just eat, sleep, > and do it again where need. You can, but like I said...Whatever is done > also can be maximum utility, even a slow build up romance can be always a > maximum from start to finish. > > > > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + > participants + delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7975987d435c5ded-M3b2a69dcb86d6c8871cdc53f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
