Why spend time on an AGI movie? Wouldn't the time be better spent on theory and implementation? Speaking of movies, take Casablanca. My favorite lines:
Girl: Will I see you tonight? Bogart: I don't make plans that far ahead. It's like this with AGI. People talk about machines deciding this, doing that, but where is it? Planning too far ahead... On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:39 AM Mohammadreza Alidoust <[email protected]> wrote: > > What a movie! Greaaat! > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021, 14:30 Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We should use AGI to create the movie. We could use GPT-3 to auto complete >> the script, and DALL-E to generate the movie scenes. :) >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 5:41 PM Mohammadreza Alidoust >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thank you all. I really enjoyed your ideas and great scenarios. However, my >>> scenario is different. >>> >>> In my dream script, I have roles for the members of the AGI Society so they >>> act as themselves. (And I wish they accept acting in the film) . It would >>> be nice to have a film whose actors/actresses are all AGIS members. And why >>> not to have you talented people as superstars? >>> >>> Actually, all I want to do is to turn my idea to a script, screenplay, or >>> whatever you name it. Then professional filmmakers would do the rest. I >>> have to find a way, perhaps connections in Hollywood ;) >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 00:22 Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> There are differences in what we should be doing with AGI, what we will >>>> actually do with it, and what we show a movie audience. >>>> >>>> We think we will be building humanoid robots that become conscious, mostly >>>> because Hollywood says so. What we will actually be doing is automating >>>> labor with language, vision, and robotics. We don't need to reproduce >>>> human weaknesses like emotions to get what evolution programmed us to >>>> want. We don't need human shaped robots except maybe for sex. >>>> >>>> AGI might result in a state of eternal bliss for all of humanity or our >>>> uploads, or it might be self replicating nanotechnology that displaces DNA >>>> based life. What we should be doing is deciding which future we want. And >>>> I am not so sure. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 1:09 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > "Besides, your utopia of magic genies sucks." >>>>> >>>>> Dude...unimpressed... >>>>> >>>>> The world will turn into a nanobot hive (very technological/ advanced) >>>>> that is the final most advanced technology that repairs instantly and is >>>>> immortal, it will always be in bliss. The only thing left will be it will >>>>> seek to grow in size by eating more matter and cloning by "sex" and >>>>> repair minute things damaged, IDK if it will be in pain, pain seems to >>>>> pressure all areas like repair and damage and trying to improve at X, but >>>>> for what it is worth, this is supposed to be an always happy system and >>>>> yes it can keep enjoying the same meal or video game by simply erasing >>>>> memories or feeling unbored of it. Such a system like this seeks to be >>>>> immortal and ends up lasting, it does not suicide nor will it. >>>>> >>>>> There is no nor needed a "build up romance", you just eat, sleep, and do >>>>> it again where need. You can, but like I said...Whatever is done also can >>>>> be maximum utility, even a slow build up romance can be always a maximum >>>>> from start to finish. > > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + > delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7975987d435c5ded-M213802cd4dbd18c29ccc5b87 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
