Bitbucket has no code (viewable) and no members listed. GitHub has no check-ins for the last 5 years. It has no public members.
... Not gonna lie - if I were on the business end of this, I would treat it as "up for grabs". It's not particularly possible to identify who owns it (neither of the two code sites have a user, the domain name is obscurred with defunct link and without whois owner) - what would you expect someone to do? Find people that link a defunct GitHub on LinkedIn and then contact them? How? I'm giving the point to Ben here. If you want to be able to be found, you have to make it easier. A registered trademark or clear whois goes a long way here. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 08:34 Keith Brawner <[email protected]> wrote: > Trueagi.com redirects to a dead Google sites link. > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 08:33 Keith Brawner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> USPTO search for "trueagi" shows no trademark. >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 07:28 stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So is there a registered trademark too or just Intarweb URLs? >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >>> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >>> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + >>> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> >>> Permalink >>> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td41939bd247598ef-Mfbe9254e7411c067f2ce9597> >>> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Td41939bd247598ef-M46751355590cf3057bebca49 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
