Boris, well, personally I don't think there is a need for a strict "top level," but I do believe that we often focus on a single proposition -- but it is in a coherent totality, not necessarily top level. Thanks for the Yann LC comment, sounds like him...
On 5/20/22, Boris Kazachenko <cogno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then I guess your "judgement" is top-level choices. The problem is, GI can't > have a fixed top level, forming incrementally higher levels of > generalization is what scalable learning is all about. So, any choice on any > level is "judgement", which renders the term meaningless. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta80108e594369c8d-M73f7427b3f200928eb63e88c Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
