Matt Mahoney wrote:
Maybe because philosophy isn't real science, and Oxford decided FHI's funding would be better off spent elsewhere. You could argue that existential risk of human extinction is important, but browsing their list of papers doesn't give me a good feeling that they have produced anything important besides talk. What hypotheses have they tested?
Science is a branch of philosophy, classically referred to as "natural philosophy". A local science club was founded in 1871...
https://pswscience.org/about-psw/ -- You can't out-crazy a Democrat. #EggCrisis #BlackWinter White is the new Kulak. Powers are not rights. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Te0da187fd19737a7-M1c757ea607e123f2709de401 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
