I'm in the USA and I can see the demo videos. Why would China block a website that reflects positively on their country? China is rapidly investing in semiconductors and AI in response to US export restrictions and the trade war that both parties in the US started and will lose.
Why are we worried about government spying on us using AI? We already allow the big tech companies to do this by planting microphones and cameras around our homes that are always on so we can tell Alexa to turn on the lights or play music. Don't you want a smart home that can unlock your doors using face recognition, or see if you fall down and call 911? And what drug and serial killing problem did we tackle? In the US, drug overdoses (mostly fentanyl) make up 3% of deaths and is doubling every 6 years in response to a crackdown on prescription opioids, forcing addicts to switch to illegal sources that aren't labeled or tested. We did cut crime by half since the 1990s by locking up 1.3% of the male population, meaning that every man can expect on average to spend one year of his life in prison (3 years if black). The US has the highest rate of imprisonment in the world. Maybe we can ask China how they managed to have a homicide rate that is only 1/10 of the US and why their cities are safe to walk at night. On Fri, Jun 7, 2024, 4:20 AM mm ee <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw some captures on Twitter, it looks insanely impressive! This and the > recent paper by OpenAI on SAEs makes me think they aren't as far ahead as > they were on GPT-4's release. It's still pretty crazy that a lot of the > truly impressive modern neural architecture is usually pioneered by them > first (probably because they're the only ones actually going back and > trying whatever works) > > It also gets me thinking about what the ex-employee Leopold talked about. > While I'm of the camp that the there should be minimal restrictions on AI > to foster the growth of the space, it's pretty clear that any function can > be learned sufficiently with a large enough network, the right neural > architecuture, and a lot of data and time. I don't think scaling up a > neural network will ever lead to reasoning, but do you really need to > reason to connect all of the minor associations extracted from every > transcripted presidential address and piece together a reasonable > approximation of the nuclear launch codes? > > I've always had this sci-fi idea floating around in my head of a device > that you place in a room and remove it after N hours. You can then plug it > into some machine and get a reconstructed approximation of what that room > looked like up to N hours before you placed it, by using some form of > learned model of how the light bounces around the room and some other > assumptions. It wouldn't be perfect, but imagine getting even a 90% > accurate reconstruction of everyone and everything that happened in a room > without ever having been there while it was happening. > > It sounds ludicrous, but we are steadily approaching the age of being able > to approximate nearly anything we can dream of. When put this way, the > potential use cases are terrifying. Again, I'm of the opinion that our > society will generally adapt to meet the increased potential of individuals > - just like how inter-state communication and cross border policing had to > rapidly evolve to tackle the 70s/80s drug and serial killing wave. But the > thought that in less than 20 years from now, a stranger could just drive by > your home, park for a couple of minutes, drive off and have a > representation of the interior layout of your house, complete with > reconstructions of exactly where everyone was and what they doing via > radio/audio data, a laser and an NN, is insane - yet that is the kind of > tech that will exist. Then you need to imagine what this looks like when > the CIA and other foreign intelligence actors lean into these tools 100%. > To have any semblance of privacy, people would need to have a constant > persona, a false memetic fabrication meant to trick any would-be NNs that > feed off of the data they emit. > > Worst part is that this is unstoppable at this point, every country is > pushing to have better and better versions of this technology, it is > inevitable. I am looking forward to be able to generate a proper Men In > Black 4, though. > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2024, 12:37 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> https://kling.kuaishou.com/ >> <https://kling.kuaishou.com/#expression-body-view> >> >> Do you see the demo if you are in China? I see nothing yet other than >> people saying this ... >> > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta32348ecc8396e1a-Mf860d7385b782efdd194f5a7> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta32348ecc8396e1a-M529b238c3cc71b8bc4039b78 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
