On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 4:02 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>
wrote:

> ...
>
> I prefer simpler programs, but as Legg proved, good predictors are
> necessarily complex. His proof goes something like this: suppose you have a
> simple but powerful prediction algorithm. Then I can create a simple
> sequence that your program can't predict. My program runs a copy of your
> program and outputs the opposite of yours....
>

Oh, well I should have suspected that Legg would already have made the case
for losslessly compressing Wikipedia as an ideal benchmark for Forensic
Epistemology! :)

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6cf3be509c7cd2f2-M8ae17d9e86ba78020beb33a7
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to