Matt, write your paper as you wish, the style you want and include what you 
want, e.g. your version with your abstract. "Just because I quote" - the quotes 
are an organic part and a trigger of the rest - I do credit other researchers' 
contribution or related work, unlike what they do regarding my work, preceding 
theirs with from several years to up to 20-25 years and still counting.

 *"The actual threat of AI ..."
*
My interpretation, as in the paper, is that AI, thinking machines or the 
proper-intelligence (cognition, general intelligence) *is/are not the threat.* 

On the other hand, the homo sapiens are a historically proven "threat" without 
any doubt - many of their leaders and the leaders their "sub-leaders" supported 
were monsters, cheaters, liars and sadists who are a threat both for their own 
"species" and for the thinking machines (BTW, one German and his democratic and 
progressive nation and corporations were trying to protect the humanity and 
"species", that is why they exterminated millions, did you forget. He took 
lessons from his cousins and recent compatriots from an island near-by, and a 
continent over the ocean).

*"Automating human labor requires modeling 8 billion human brains"

*It doesn't and "economically valuable work" is a joke (see the footnote etc.)

(...)

*"The actual threat of AI is that if you got everything you wanted, then you 
would be dead.** "

*Yes, e.g. you could become a cyborg :))), or the machines will be the better 
"humans'", and the "cyborg" might "be death", according to some legal system of 
the species of the AI-aligners like "John" Connor, who are protecting the 
humanity from the terminators. (...)
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Teedaf4a19e56877e-M54366152cc3806d424fec416
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to