On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 5:02 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, it's good to see you're making enough headway to understand why I > might have gone from: > > 2014's Sortocracy.org > <https://sortocracy.org/minimalist-rules-for-sortocracy/> (Sensing the > rise of Trumpism) > ... I need to reiterate the statement about territorial rent in the minimalist rules: "Sortocracy issues cash flow to States for territorial rent. This money is backed by territorial value." This is not what you might think of as transferable money since it goes out from Sortocracy and returns to Sortocracy without any further circulation. That's why the emphasis on backing and why issuance and rent are tied. Hence the first sentence in what follows: Sortocracy is just about land value which you apparently place at about > $400T. In that scenario money would change hands as part of the periodic > (say 10 year) census/territory reallocation. The accounting portion could > be automated with relatively simple algorithms that most anyone with a > developed-world secondary school education could understand. > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5b58bcc51c493d41-Mbcda55e184903b56286c5a1c Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
