Quite correct. It's not a competition with physics, but the fact that he assumed his model would map to the physical word. If so, he has to face the falsifiability gauntlet any conjecture should. For example, can the Higgs operator be derived from his proposal as is?
Now, if we took his idea and applied it as is to existing models, it won't matter if the proposed index was re-generated by the code. It would become irrelevant dueto not, for example addressing the Feigenbaum constant, amongst many other tripwires, which should probably be present in any scalar bifurcation schema. It can't simply be brute forced by a computational model, or could it? Reminds me that there's really " No Free Lunch". On Wed, 14 Oct 2026, 14:58 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 13, 2026, at 8:39 AM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > Looking into Turing tiling and human fingers. Fascinating! > > By comparison, AI is such a crude machine. > > > It dawned on me what Logvinovich is doing. Something else I was working on > a while back. Your AI bug finder missed the bigger picture. Universal > indexing, but he’s using binary registers. He’s lays an index on the > physical geometry to connect physics, math and software, a dimension > reduction to 2D. From the index points he tries to generate the math > physics, he constructs the periodic table by projecting it using generative > grammar. AI found bugs at the points and some of the math might be > incomplete or wrong. But some of this is unknown anyway. > > For example in this paper he attempts to describe the fine structure > “running” constant starting from the symmetry break at 136, then to the > next register +1, then some mathematical reasoning on Dirac singularities > and conjectures that the asymptotic freedom of the electromagnetic register > is the monotone decay of its Hamming weight and the 0.036 offset is the low > energy shadow of it’s running. It’s a conjecture. > > https://zenodo.org/records/22882422 > > The index is like a database index but it’s a mathematical index. If you > get the indexing right you can write the software. Physicists want new > insight proofs into physics and software engineers want to write software > to exercise predictions on the physics. A physicist looks at it and says > “Oh there’s nothing new here”, yeah, he’s doing your job. Physics isn’t a > silo. > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M61464e3afda24ce4f7f2048a> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-Mf0eefad3f55c70c3a473dc71 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
