Sergio,

You’re then *saying* something v. different to what you *mean.*

“You can’t be intelligent without physics” to AGI-ers will probably mean 
something like: *you can’t be intelligent without a knowledge of the laws of 
physics*. IN that case, an AGI-er will think, I can just encode the laws of 
physics as a set of logical propositions...  

Sounds like you should read up on cog. embodied sci. -    wh. is much more 
important here than “physics”.  You have to talk about how:

1) real world intelligence

is only possible if 

2) you have/are a *body* in the real world (embodiment)  and know 

3) the problems of a body moving about the world, and

4) the problems of observing other real world bodies.

One can add that you have to have
5) “physical experience” of the world  (or “tacit knowledge”/ (possibly) 
“procedural knowledge”)  -  wh. is 90-odd % of our total knowledge of the world 
-  and not just the tiny few per cent that is “declarative/ propositional 
knowledge.”
Put that another way: it’s no good knowing the laws of motion if you’ve never 
thrown a stone or looked at the sun and moon in the sky. AGI-ers think they can 
survive with f=ma and no physical experience of the relevant real things. 
Fantastic delusion.
From: Sergio Pissanetzky 
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 3:33 PM
To: AGI 
Subject: RE: [agi] Simplistic Test of Reason-Based Reasoning

AGI,

 

Mike is saying the same thing I always say, only with different words. He is 
suggesting that a machine can not be intelligent without a presence in the real 
world and experience of real things. I am saying a machine can not be 
intelligence without Physics. But in addition, I am saying that this is an AGI 
blog and we are trying to build a machine. A machine is a physical object and 
it must obey the laws of Physics. That is the crude reality, and no amount of 
thinking will help.  

 

 

Sergio

 

 

From: Mike Tintner [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 8:40 AM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Simplistic Test of Reason-Based Reasoning

 

Both a book and a computer running a program are inanimate objects – mere tools 
which can in certain circumstances produce the illusion of intelligence. 
Inanimate objects aren’t intelligent.

 

Neither has the slightest capacity for real world intelligence or real world 
reasoning – because they do not have a body and therefore the “animate” 
capacity to move about the real world, observe it, investigate it, and gather 
new, fresh information about it

 

The idea – your idea – that a machine can be intelligent – solve real world 
problems - about trees, rocks, houses, chairs, cars, traffic, cities, people, 
economics or politics et al – without a presence in the real world and 
experience of real things is a fantastic delusion without a scintilla of 
evidence -   more fantastic than the most fantastic religious delusion.

 

(I can’t BTW recall you ever discussing or thinking about any form of real 
world intelligence – if you tried it you would realise just how fantastic a 
delusion it is).

 

P.S. I guess you could call it the “dummy” delusion – the belief that a 
ventriloquist’s dummy can be alive and intelligent about everything – just 
because the ventriloquist “breathed life” into it for a few minutes..

 

 

From: Jim Bromer 

Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 2:14 PM

To: AGI 

Subject: Re: [agi] Simplistic Test of Reason-Based Reasoning

 

No it is not like saying that a book can evolve into a human being.  Even a 
child can see the difference between a computer and a book.

Jim Bromer

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote:

PM: One should seriously take a look at Apple's SIRI since a system like that 
may evolve into an AGI if it is 

equipped with sufficient back end services (i.e., actions).  

 

This is an absolutely fantastic (but probably commonplace) delusion. It’s like 
saying – a book (and a book can be organized to function like a program) can 
evolve into a human being (or an animal).

 

An infant can see the massive differences between a book and a human being, but 
an awful lot of AGI-ers can’t.

      AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription 
     
     

 

      AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription 
     
     

      AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription
     
     

 

      AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to