Yes, just one program. Why do you ask? I expect that I will need to write a lot of algorithms to get it to even resemble the kind of program I want it to be. Jim Bromer
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]>wrote: > > Jim, > > Last question. It sounds to me like you're attempting to write one > program / application rather than a collection of applications that > run in concert and act upon a knowledge base? > > Am I mistaken? > > ~PM > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:10:30 -0400 > Subject: Re: [agi] Simplistic Test of Reason-Based Reasoning > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > I agree with this. My opinion is that deliberation is a method where you > can bring different kinds of knowledge to bear while trying to better > understand a situation. Simpler reactions can be used for habit like > responses which are made in reaction to familiar situations. However, I do > not think that quick human level (or animal level) responses to complex > situations are that feasible for me. I think deliberation will be easier > for me. > > However, my idea of structured reasoning may allow the program to create > simple algorithms (pasting bugless scriptlets together) in such a way that > other concepts could have some kind of structured influence on the > algorithm (that the program created) as it was running without having it > mash up whatever reasoning it was doing. One of my criticisms of being > too reliant on funnel reasoning is that useful information will be turned > to mash and over cooked when the resultants of different kinds of concepts > are combined. This is why I don't see differentiation as a significant > problem. I am not going to be mashing analyses together. On the other > hand this is why I see complexity as a major problem. Reasoning is going > to take place on the basis of a lot of little pieces of information and not > the extrusion of a big hopper at the end of a funnel-down decision process. > Jim Bromer > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > Jim, > > I'd submit to you that your system have two loops: a reaction loop to > handle familiar recurring situations, > and a deliberation loop to be invoked when habitual or reflex reactions > become insufficient (i.e., fail to > achieve their desired outcomes beyond some threshold of the time--e.g., > failing 30% of the time)). > > > One should seriously take a look at Apple's SIRI since a system like that > may evolve into an AGI if it is > equipped with sufficient back end services (i.e., actions). It has a > reasoner which I presume responds > to user requests in a rule based or case based manner and is tied into > various service providers. > > Cheers! > > ~PM > > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-164650b2> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
