On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote:

> No one here has agreed with any part of this - and I have discussed every
> part to some extent. The only possible exception, from memory, is that you
> do refer somewhere in your writings to improvisation.
>


There is a difference between creativity and mature creativity.  The
overwhelming majority of babies are able to learn to make marks on paper
but that does not mean that the marks represent art that should be hung on
museum walls for posterity.  I think AGI has to be creative in order to
solve problems in reasoning; however, creativity alone is not sufficient to
produce artificial intelligence.  I am looking for the secrets
of intelligent creativity.

It is fairly easy to make computer programs that will be 'creative' that,
for example, will create novel abstract images on the screen or which will
turn photographs into original art works using a certain range of styles
but it is more difficult to write a program that would, for example,
be able to discuss what it is doing and modify its style on the basis of a
discussion.

One of the characteristics of conventional thinking is dogmatism.
Conventional thinking is not conformist because there will always be some
sub-groups which a thinker, even a conventional thinker, will challenge.

Jim Bromer






On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]>wrote:

> No one here has agreed with any part of this - and I have discussed every
> part to some extent. The only possible exception, from memory, is that you
> do refer somewhere in your writings to improvisation.
>
> But there is nothing AFAIK in Opencog that improvises.
>
> I don't think you can improvise BTW without fluid schemas/ outlines/
> concepts directing embodied action. That is another new part of the
> approach. And you have completely disagreed with this - which is absolutely
> fundamental to AGI.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Ben Goertzel
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 11:25 AM
> To: AGI
> Subject: Re: [agi] Does Siri + Watson = AGI ?
>
>
>  AGI is the prosecution of *idea-based, *one-step-at-a-time, improvised, *
>> adventurous, *patchwork new courses of action. Creative new,
>> "ill-structured"/ *free thought and action. In the real world.
>>
>>
> yah... thing is, pretty much everyone on this list agrees with you, on
> the level of this kind of crude, verbally-formulated philosophy...
>
> And many of us have approaches we think will ultimately be able to
> achieve this, which you dismiss because you don't understand the
> technical details, and the language we use to describe our work
> doesn't happen to push your emotional buttons ;-/ ...
>
> ben
>
>
> ------------------------------**-------------
> AGI
> Archives: 
> https://www.listbox.com/**member/archive/303/=now<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/**member/archive/rss/303/**
> 6952829-59a2eca5<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5>
> Modify Your Subscription: 
> https://www.listbox.com/**member/?&;<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
>
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>
>
> ------------------------------**-------------
> AGI
> Archives: 
> https://www.listbox.com/**member/archive/303/=now<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/**member/archive/rss/303/**
> 10561250-164650b2<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-164650b2>
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/**
> member/?&id_**secret=10561250-2cb1ec2f<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to