Jim Bromer wrote:
I am presenting a rough idea of a conceptual network as a potential
advancement from earlier ideas like semantic networks. Looking on
Wikipedia I found some examples of semantic networks. In a semantic
network the nodes are the "concepts" and the edges are "relations
between concepts". A semantic network was usually defined with a
conveniently finite number of definitions of the edges (as types of
relations between concepts) and a lot of nodes (which were the
concepts). One difference then is that the conceptual network that I
envision will not be limited by the number of relations between
concepts. This initial presentation, however, is a little misleading
because, as can easily be deduced from an inspection of a semantic
network, it is obvious that the edges, which are called "relations
between the concepts," are concepts themselves. So in the conceptual
network, a relation could become a concept itself. And the conceptual
network that I am thinking of does not have a single systematic method
of being 'activated' in some way (although searches would be made
through it). Furthermore, the network does not have to be envisioned as
a single network, but since different kinds of concepts may be
associated arbitrarily the potential for interrelations would tend to be
extensive.

...

This is not an easy model but I believe it could be developed and at
least tested with some simple cases.

OMG!!! When did you grow a brain?? I thought me and Mike were the only people on this list who even knew what the right track looked like...

/me rummages around for the cap, diploma, and cookie which you now deserve...

Anyway, welcome to the club that Gets It (tm).



--
E T F
N H E
D E D

Powers are not rights.



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to