Jim,

For diagrams: Visio, or MindJet.

Apart from that, are you considering deep structure relations, as opposed to surface structure (language).

For Example, from the YKY "Concept Composition Logic" paper:

"John believes Mary Loves John."

Ok, so as a surface structure relation, that's straightforward.

But the deep structure is: Why does John believe that Mary Love John? Is it the way she talks to him, the way she touches him, the way she laughs at his jokes, etc. What evidence does John think means that Mary Loves John.

"John believes Mary Loves John" implies John has a model of what Love looks like, and has seen some of that in Mary's relations to him. This model and evidence is the deep structure. And the evidence that produced the model is an even deeper structure.

Did he get that model by watching his parents' behavior toward each other, or watching TV shows, or reading romance novels, or what his friends told him, etc.? There is no right answer to what is "love" -- it's a vague concept that different people can disagree on without a definitive answer. And many human concepts are like that (loyalty, bravery, cowardice, morality, etc).

On 10/7/2012 7:56 PM, Jim Bromer wrote:

I don't have a diagram and I would not know how to draw one. The idea is that a great deal of information can be related to different kinds of concepts that might be considered central to some idea. I have figured out a way that I should be able to experiment with the idea using concrete examples expressed with simple language. This experiment will not be a true AGI program but it should allow me to see if the structural conceptual networks idea is feasible as a way to represent an AGI program.

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Diagrams Jim,

    Diagrams.

    ~PM

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:07:38 -0400

    Subject: Re: [agi] Conceptual Structure?
    From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


    I forgot about conceptual structure itself. Conceptual structure
    is based on the idea that structure in language is vital to
    understanding language, and that structure in ideas must also be
    understood to understand the ideas.  For instance temporal
    structure is often important and so is positional structure.  But
    when you think about it these two kinds of relationships are only
    concepts.  While they seem to have a wide application to many
    different kinds of things they are still only concepts.  This
    shows that concepts may play different kinds of roles when used
    with other concepts.  This insight seems obvious to me but it also
    seems obviously important.  If you can find that certain concepts
    can take on the role of an abstracting or generalizing agent then
    doesn't this imply that other concepts might also take on roles
    that go beyond their surface characteristics?  For example, the
    position of an object is what it is.  To recognize that position
    and relative position might be used to create highly generalized
    principles that have advanced mankind's understanding of matter
    and technology is to recognize that a seemingly dull feature of a
    concept can be used as an agent of insight.  So then I am saying
    that by exploring the roles and structures of concepts I expect to
    find other activating principles of insight that may have eluded
    us so far.
    Jim Bromer


    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
    <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-164650b2>
    | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
    [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>


*AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10215994-5ed4e9d1> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>


____________________________________________________________
Refinance for 1.750%/2.926% APR
Loans under 729K usually qualify for US GOV backed refinance programs
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5072733edf501733d589bst02duc


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to