Jim Bromer wrote:
So whereas I do think that a simplifying process is necessary and I do
think that a universal format and something like a semantic net is a
good way to go, I am not talking about a traditional kind of semantic
net in which the relationship between words is found by
a single abstraction or by a handful of abstractions of the relations
between words and referential objects of the words and sentences. This
kind of semantic net was based on a superficial analysis that indicated
that the relations between word-objects might be simplified using
an concise list of abstractions. I am thinking of a relativistic
semantic net where a word-object can also become an abstraction of a
relation or part of the definition of a process of abstraction.
Wow! That paragraph was fucking awesome, good ol' f'n A...
I've been trying to get people to understand that concept for years, I
think you might actually get through to some people! Thanks!!! =)))
--
E T F
N H E
D E D
Powers are not rights.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
