Mike, here's something for you to chew on:

I like to think of the term "random" as meaning the absence of a *detectable
* pattern, due to biases and/or blind spots of the observer or perspective.
Under this definition, it is implicit that anything can be seen as random
or non-random given an appropriate observer or perspective.

I think our minds are simply filters for reality, designed to pluck out the
most common and useful patterns through appropriate biases. We look for the
patterns we do because they help us accomplish our evolutionary purpose.
When something looks random to us, it simply means we can't identify a
pattern, not that there isn't one.

Mathematics is a language for representing the sort of patterns the human
mind tends to perceive. It is, in other words, a language for representing
reality in terms of our intrinsic human perceptual biases. We have integer
arithmetic because we perceive discrete, countable units in the universe.
We have calculus because we perceive continuous phenomena such as curves,
areas, volumes, and flows in the universe. We have geometry and topology
because we perceive shapes and invariances of shape in the universe. We
have logic because we perceive a mapping between situations and their
descriptions (language, including math) in the universe. And we find
commonalities and relationships between the various branches of
mathematics, described in the terms of logic because logic is the language
we use to talk about languages, including those of mathematics.

Much of the confusion and failure generated by Boolean logic, the most
commonly used and least versatile form of "fully functional" logic, arises
from the failure of Boolean logic to recognize the distinction between
different kinds of false statements (pieces of language). Boolean logic
only recognizes statements that are false because their opposites are true.
But it completely disregards the existence of statements which cannot be
mapped to reality to verify their truth. These sorts of statements are not
false because their opposites are true, but because they are meaningless.
This lack of distinction (a bias towards perceiving truth and falsehood but
not meaninglessness) is the source of many mathematical and logical
paradoxes.

As for your "irregular forms", Mike, what all this boils down to is that if
the regularity of some aspect of the world isn't visible to mathematics, it
isn't visible to *people*. Mathematics simply codifies what our brains
already do. When we notice a regularity in reality, we create a branch of
mathematics to describe it. If we don't see a regularity in a portion of
reality, we call it random and mentally disregard it. I am identifying
concepts themselves as human-perceivable regularities in the world, in case
that isn't readily apparent. Thus if we can conceptualize something, it
must be regular in our minds, and either a branch of mathematics exists to
describe those regularities, or we can create one. (These new branches of
math always start out as human language and become steadily more formalized
as we become more certain about what the regularities are and how to more
effectively describe them in language.)

So, in summary:
1) A concept is a human-perceivable regularity.
2) Mathematics is a highly refined language for describing
human-perceivable regularities.
Therefore:
3) Mathematics is a highly refined language for describing concepts.

Mathematics (and language in general) is how we tell each other about the
world. If something can't be described in terms of mathematics, it's
because it either can't be perceived, or we have identified a new branch of
mathematics that needs to be created. Eventually, we will have covered all
the filtering biases evolution has built into our minds, and mathematics
will be sufficient to describe all concepts the human mind can perceive
without further additions to the language.



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to