Ben, Please correct me if I am wrong here, but...
The underlying problem you are attempting to solve here springs from evaluating relationships based on observed, calculated, or guesstimated probabilities, rather than carrying unresolved probabilities through the computations to (hopefully) resolve or cancel themselves prior to taking actions based upon them. Right? I have already posted a method on this forum (based on computing with equations rather than only with simple numbers) to address this problem, that requires no new (restrictive) "theory". Should I re-post? Steve ================== On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote: > An interesting, though low-priority, train of speculation I've been > thinking about these last couple weeks, inspired by Dirk Aerts' > work... > > http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Quantum_Inference > > ;) > ben > > > > -- > Ben Goertzel, PhD > http://goertzel.org > > "My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > -- Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full employment. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
