On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Steve Richfield <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ben, > > Please correct me if I am wrong here, but... > > The underlying problem you are attempting to solve here springs from > evaluating relationships based on observed, calculated, or guesstimated > probabilities, rather than carrying unresolved probabilities through the > computations to (hopefully) resolve or cancel themselves prior to taking > actions based upon them. Right? > OpenCog's Probabilistic Logic Network already attempts to do what you say.... Quantum inference would do it differently... > I have already posted a method on this forum (based on computing with > equations rather than only with simple numbers) to address this problem, > that requires no new (restrictive) "theory". > > Should I re-post? > > Sure, why not ;) ben ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
