I discovered something about logic that I never knew before.  It is
something that I have thought about for 40 years, but I never stopped to
explore the application.  Now, shouldn't this new insight give me greater
understanding?  Well, yeah, but it doesn't work that way.  I have a new
insight but I haven't got any use for it.  So now I have to try to find
some practical use for it.  Well even though I don't have any use for it, I
might pick up some street creds by telling other people about it right?
Well no, not really.  It is really a turn-the-crank kind of thing and the
fact that I thought about it for so long without ever once examining its
application is kind of embarrassing.  So now, before I can talk about it I
have to search for some way to use the idea effectively.  If I found some
utility for it then I could pick up some credit for it, but until then it
is just going to make my work with logic more complicated.

The insight was a turn-the-crank kind of insight so it represented the
application of a familiar idea onto another familiar idea in a way that was
very familiar to me.  The only thing I did different was to actually see
how it worked in a few examples.  When I did that I realized that the
effects were not exactly what I expected.  However, logic is an artificial
field which is well formed so that other logic-based ideas, like something
from mathematics, can sometimes be easily integrated into it.  In real
world examples of ideative projection, the analysis of turn-the-crank
imagination cannot easily be achieved just by using other (integrated or
related) methods of internal ideative projection.  And as I just explained,
simple correlation methods are not an easy substitute for insightful
methods.

Jim Bromer



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to