I am not sure how this fits into your lists but I think AGI needs to be
able to make reason-based reasoning.  It has to have the potential, in many
cases, to discover the reasons why it would take some action. This may not
be true for all actions it is takes but the higher artificial cognitive
methods should include reason-based reasoning. It also has to be able to
understand the reasons it uses and thereby 'explain' or describe them at
least in internal explanations so that it can use these reasons in planning.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Piaget Modeler
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> I think we are forming a list of requirements and we have to see how well
> the proposed approaches (OOA included) meet them.
>
> *Requirements*:
>
> 1. Efficient Organization
> 2. Efficient Execution
> 3. Easy to Understand
> 4. Supports vast interconnections among concepts
> 5. Rapid Execution to continually reevaluate multiple paths
> 6. Need to switch search spaces rapidly
> 7. Need to expand or restrict search spaces dynamically
> 8. Need for concept integration
> 9. Need for concept differentiation
> 10. Need to fluidly recombine concepts
> 11. Need to support simulation and multiple path exploration.
>
> *Assumptions*
>
>
> *Dependencies*
>
>
> *Constraints*
>
>
>
> Anything else to add? Are any of these Assumptions or constraints rather
> than requirements?
>
> Kindly advise.
>
> ~PM.
>
>
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-470149cf> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to