And it has to accommodate the roles a statement may play which can be implicitly or explicitly learned. Do you agree?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]>wrote: > > That is also true. That is why your knowledge representation has to > accommodate both uses. > Now we're getting to some REAL requirements. (Do you follow?) > ~PM. > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:30:18 -0500 > > Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Representation > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > > A prediction may stand as a statement. It does not have to be part of an > implication or inference. > Jim > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Piaget Modeler < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I would submit that "John Smith won the lottery" is neither a prediction > nor an explanation. > It is just a statement of fact which has a different structure. It can be > included in a prediction > as either the antecedent or consequent. > > A prediction has the form "If x then y", an explanation "y because x", > which are both the same > structure. > > This is my view of things. > > ~PM > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-5cfde295> | > Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10561250-470149cf> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
