I agree, you're only done with the architecture at that point.  
You still need to implement and get results.  
Can you (1) reiterate what you meant so that it is comprehensible to the rest 
of the world, and then (2) outline the next steps? 
~PM.
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:37:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Representation
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

No, produce something that actually works.  Then you are done.  Not simple.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:






You'd have to repeat that in Math, or Algorithms and Data Structures to make it 
comprehensible (to me). 
There are too many concepts such as "boundaries with transcendent overlaps" 
that are private to you alone.

But I suppose you're understanding my method.  List the requirements, 
constraints, dependencies, and assumptions.  Then find a solution to address 
them all.  Iterate until done. Very simple.

Cheers!
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:30:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [agi] Internal Representation
From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

So the program needs to be able to form 'ideas' but then it needs to be able to 
use them in different ways.  For example you may know something and use that 
knowledge in your thinking without necessarily acting on that particular piece 
of knowledge.  We can talk about an explosion without actually exploding 
something.

  Constraining the search space and using boundaries with transcendent overlaps 
are ways which our programs might avoid combinatorial explosions. And we can 
use branching indexes as a means to find more detailed information.  Then, if 
particular 'ideas' are more closely associated with particular index branches 
(or with other 'ideas' that are associatively distributed in a similar way) 
they might not come to mind unless there is some other reason to be looking at 
that particular group of 'ideas'. If 'ideas' should be associated with other 
groups of ideas (or at other points on the index) then they can be cross 
associated.  However, the index associations should be categorized or sub 
indexed in some way so that the system does not become overwhelmed by 
associating all 'ideas' at the root or initial path into the index.

  



  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  








  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to