cyc hardly used an "obvious" approach, they used some kind of weird syntax to attempt to categorize a fallacy "common sense knowledge" something that doesn't objectively exist.
topcoder competitions are interesting, in that with input, output, and output testing it may be possible to evolve functions. Am hoping on using it later on to evolve drivers and things. who knows maybe one day there will be evolutionary algorithmic drivers so good they can beat human programmers. Anyways if that happens it'll still be a win for "narrow AI", similar to chess, and jeopardy, as it's a minor aspect of what it means to be a general intelligence. Best way of proving AGI in an undeniable fashion, is to have "wild" AGI's robots running around self-replicating in the environment. Admitedly most wild organisms have brains significantly larger than those of their domestic counter-parts, so we may develop domestic AGI's first. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
