On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Not at all. To participate in the reverse Turing test, all that is needed is > to set aside a few hours to compete, which I would find enjoyable. The TOTAL > commitment would be a day or so, and it could potentially yield SO much > information.
So stop complaining and create a website with an online test. > Also, the linguistic theory only requires reading and discussing, like we are > doing with SO many issues right here. The problem is that people don't even > want to THINK (perish the thought) that English might NOT be well structured, > as all other theories predict. Who thinks that English is well structured? > Not wanting to explore the rock-paper-scissors http://www.rpscontest.com/ > or the SUVFM issues, etc., http://www.humanconnectomeproject.org/ > tells me that there is NOT ONE true scientist here, as in promoting AGI > without investigating its underpinnings is truly a fools errand, akin to > promoting rapid low-temperature fusion, aka DIY hydrogen bombs. > > Of course there are other opinions on these issues, none of which I see as > responsible. So what is your plan? -- -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
