On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Steve Richfield
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> The patent was on a proprietary program to compress seismic data. It
>> was one of many customer-specific compressors that I wrote. All of my
>> open source programs like PAQ and ZPAQ remain free of patents, and I
>> plan to keep it that way.
>
> You have no choice - as they are firmly in the public domain.

I mean I won't patent any improvements. And publishing does guarantee
that I can't patent the existing algorithms. That's the point.

>> If my employer didn't let me publish my work
>> open source and unencumbered, I could just retire now (since I can
>> afford to) and nothing would change.
>
> ... until the economy pancakes and your savings become worthless.

I am not so pessimistic. I think the economy will continue to grow
thanks to automation.

>> The process will be very expensive.
>
> So the big corporations will own it, now us.

An unfortunate consequence of a free market is the unequal
distribution of wealth. That is why we tax the rich and give to the
poor. Either way, you benefit.

But if you can understand why the economy is growing even as machines
do our jobs, then I think you will see new opportunities.

My suggestion would be to open source Dr. Eliza and build a web
interface where people can interact with it and add to its knowledge
base. Maybe it won't be very good at first, but it will improve over
time. Don't worry for now how it is going to make money. You are
selling your skills. Maybe some opportunity will come of it.

--
-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to