On 2013/04/07, at 11:02, Piaget Modeler <piagetmode...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Could be deep neural networks, could also be constructivist symbolic neural > net or > hypothesis driven constructive induction (e.g. AQ17), or other induction > methods > (e.g., the Cruncher, or Ubercruncher). > > At this point I don't see any difference between a sign and a synthesized > internal concept. OK, thank you. Then, is the output of the decoder component a symbolic description of the scene (which may be a subset of a semantic net )? -- AN > From: naoya.arak...@nifty.com > Subject: Re: [agi] Semiosis > Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:30:23 +0900 > To: a...@listbox.com > > Dear PM, > > I have a clarification question. > > With 1 (b), do you mean concept forming from scratch such as > http://nyti.ms/T5E71e > or forming 'occurrent' internal representation of concepts/signs? > > (Non natural) signs are conventionally (socially) formed and may > or may not correspond to concepts formed with unsupervised > learning… > > -- > Naoya ARAKAWA > > > On 2013/04/07, at 10:07, Piaget Modeler <piagetmode...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Symbolic interactionism looks interesting. > > So, the beginnings of the AGI's semiosis components: > > `1. Decoder component > > (a) receives percepts, > (b) forms concepts (i.e., signs), > (c) matches or constructs ???? what ???? > > > 2. Encoder component > > (a) starts with a semantic net > (b) decides upon a subset of the semantic net to encode > (c) chooses signs related to the concepts in the subset > (d) forms a plan to utter the signs > (e) executes the plan > > Is this enough. What is the name of 1.(c) ? > > Kindly advise. > > ~PM ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
