Matt: people with thousands of times more computing power have only been able to solve much easier problems like recognizing cat faces or winning at Jeopardy.
One thing we can be confident about - the brain takes a few steps to achieve what current computers take millions to trillions of steps. Only an extremely literal mind would assume that we will therefore simply have to make computers even more complex! (Unfortunately almost the whole of AI seems to have exactly such literal minds). Obviously we will have to discover and imitate the brain's much simpler technology - and it's a waste of time trying to put figures on that.
I don't understand - and can't therefore evaluate - the creative value of whatever algo you produced. But if you are genuinely creative, you should understand that a major new field of invention - as AGI will have to be - will require major new technologies, not more of the same. And you can't put figures on those.
The people who think AGI is simply about more computing power are not real creatives.
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
