On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike Tintner wrote: >> >> What’s your O.D. ? What’s the end-product of your program? Drawings? >> Buildings? Text-readings? Wtf is it going to DO? Or is that too difficult >> for you to say? >> > ... I'm getting sick of these jags you go off on. Last week it was "Well > your AI doesn't implement true creativity; prove that it does!" > > This week you are ignoring the G in general AI. The word GENERAL in AI, > like in computer science at large, means "Virtually any" So it must be > capable of dealing with virtually any problem in virtually any domain using > virtually any method. So therefore it must be able to learn any abstraction > less than equal some reasonable complexity metric and it must have the > computational capabilities to optimize and apply those abstractions. > ... > Alan, My text-based AGi program would be a limited kind of AGI program but it would be a proof-of-concept thing. If it worked then it would be general enough to convert it for different kinds of IO actions. A program that could do some genuine learning and derive abstractions from text would be flexible enough to modify for conversion to image AGI and so on. Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
