Until the last 5,000 or so years, people and animals grew up in a "natural" world where objects were complex and poorly distinguished, like rocks, trees, etc., and NOT the well-ordered "blocks world" we now live in.
All of the approaches to AGI that I have seen have presumed a well-ordered rather than a natural world. The presumptions are entirely different. It would seem MUCH easier to adapt an algorithm to a better ordered world, than to a less ordered world. Hence, shouldn't thought be put to functioning in a natural world rather than our well ordered world? Later on, when something works in a natural world, we can then transplant it to our well ordered world. Any thoughts? Steve ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
