Bizarre systems: http://plusultratech.blogspot.com/2011/12/here-is-beginning-of-my-post.html
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Steve Richfield <[email protected] > wrote: > Until the last 5,000 or so years, people and animals grew up in a > "natural" world where objects were complex and poorly distinguished, like > rocks, trees, etc., and NOT the well-ordered "blocks world" we now live in. > > All of the approaches to AGI that I have seen have presumed a well-ordered > rather than a natural world. The presumptions are entirely different. It > would seem MUCH easier to adapt an algorithm to a better ordered world, > than to a less ordered world. Hence, shouldn't thought be put to > functioning in a natural world rather than our well ordered world? > > Later on, when something works in a natural world, we can then transplant > it to our well ordered world. > > Any thoughts? > > Steve > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23601136-e0982844> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
