Thanks for the detailed email, and yes I'd be happy to help work on mapping
information.

Do you have a link to your Upper Ontology (or work in general - looks
interesting). I still want to have a look at all the current data - it is
surprising that there are so many around.

Thanks,
   Duncan


On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's cute Duncan. However, you've missed our Upper Level Ontology which
> is almost spot on to the true requirements to implement a unified database.
> We're only missing the AI side but that's a side argument for the
> rationality to implement a different/more unified base/core referential
> integrity system that is more towards the unified field theory but that's
> not a requirement until you want a conceptual processing environment for a
> brain like processor/agent..
>
> Anyway, if you're interested in mapping human information to a format that
> an AI can read (or in the short term - normal automation software) I might
> be interested.. We're working on a new Web (the Concept Web) separable from
> the previous Web layer that is computable by machines. OWL / RDF are not
> sufficient.  In Web 1.0 and 2.0 we were linking documents, e.g. web
> documents, files. What is different with OWL / RDF is that we also link
> structured data, from relational databases, from RDF databases. But we are
> still in the data level. OWL is supposed to bridge the gap between
> programming and semantic relations, in practise this has never been
> achieved! Web 3.0 has to be differentiated from the current web, it has to
> create a distinct layer on top of the existing linked data layer with its
> own referencing scheme (from WWW to GGG) that can be resolved with the
> current URI scheme. This will have its own way to define and handle terms,
> concepts, relations, axioms, rules, the structural components of an
> ontology.
>
> I envision a new Web consisting of maybe 35 Web platforms (as the new Web
> will be one giant database) covering local knowledge to science. Once phase
> 1 is completed (destruction of the old fragmented Web), I plan to roll out
> a science Web platform that directs AGI research. The system (something
> like IBM waston but much more powerful) will request scientists, etc to
> conduct detailed research to discover unknown facts about analyzed Systems.
> The system would then conduct detailed research to discover new facts about
> Systems and put these facts into the database by itself, even without
> interaction with Scientists. That's the kind of thing that would get AGI
> moving forward if done right. That would also lead to a revolution in
> science (
> http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/09/26/the-open-science-movement/)
> where Scientists, professional and amateur would have secure profiles and
> could publish ideas quickly and be on record as the first to come up with
> something long before they could get a paper out for peer review. The
> pressure to publish here would come not from the science greats but from
> the fringe. If some group of amateurs starts using their collective brains
> to start mapping out ideas in your area of expertise, you better get all of
> your work out in the daylight or they will steal your thunder. Any ideas
> you post to someone else' page are there on record, so your part is known
> to all. In the past you could have one genius pushing our understanding
> because a lot wasn't known. Today, progress is a lot more incremental and
> departmental ... One guy spends 5 years and through trial and error he
> makes a small discovery. It takes time before other researches integrate
> his discovery into their thought and put it to use because everything is
> too fragmented and fucked up. The possibilities are endless here.
>
>
> ~Azn A
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Duncan Murray <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for that - I am doing a review on all the upper ontologies I can
>> find relating to or which might benefit AI development and wanted include
>> the OpenCog definitions. (
>> http://www.acutesoftware.com.au/aikif/ontology.html)
>>
>> I have written a Python script to export the MindOntology pages into a
>> CSV file.
>> The code is -
>> https://github.com/acutesoftware/AIKIF/blob/master/AI/ontology/createMindOntology.py
>>
>> and the CSV file is -
>> https://github.com/acutesoftware/AIKIF/blob/master/AI/ontology/mindOntology.csv
>>
>> Feel free to use the code, or the CSV file in OpenCog, as I would love to
>> be able to contribute to this project.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Duncan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I believe I created that, way back when, directly as a set of wiki
>>> pages...
>>>
>>>  ben g
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Duncan Murray <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>   I have been reading this group for a while now and am interested in
>>>> mapping human information to a format that an AI can read (or in the short
>>>> term - normal automation software).
>>>>
>>>>    I was wondering if the MindOntology (
>>>> http://wiki.opencog.org/w/MindOntology) is available as a single
>>>> dataset (OWL / RDF / text), or is the source currently the set of wiki
>>>> pages?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>    Duncan Murray
>>>>    [email protected]
>>>>     *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/212726-deec6279> |
>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ben Goertzel, PhD
>>> http://goertzel.org
>>>
>>> "In an insane world, the sane man must appear to be insane". -- Capt.
>>> James T. Kirk
>>>
>>> "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery / None but ourselves can free
>>> our minds" -- Robert Nesta Marley
>>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/25449614-a78bbfa7> |
>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>
>>
>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10514698-9a8cda1e> |
>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/25449614-a78bbfa7> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to