The issue with kill switch is that we become dependent and kill switch is infeasible. And there is normalcy bias. It helps to study things like the Fukushima radiation disaster that is ongoing and how we deal with (or not deal with) it. Fukushima Daiichi accident essentially is worse than the "China Syndrome" and various governments reaction is to basically ignore and cover-up. IOW one of the cores basically exploded and vaporized and spread all over the world. I think the other cores are melting into the crust... So one can assume reaction to an AGI disaster could be the same. A raging out of control AGI would be ignored and pretended to not exist.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/fukushima-didnt-just-suffer-three-meltdowns-the-nuclear-core-has-finally-been-found-scattered-all-over-japan/5379147 John > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Archbold [mailto:[email protected]] > > There has been a little talk here, but there needs to be a > > SCIENCE OF THE KILL SWITCH. > > There are efforts I know of for mobile kill switch. Can someone name a > technology that does NOT need a kill switch? > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
